SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey has made headlines all week. Be it regarding the future of the College Football Playoffs, the future of the SEC as a whole, and the conference’s standing in College Football, he has been vocal. Sankey and the SEC are adamant that a 16-team CFP is the right direction for the sport, not a 24-team format, which the Big Ten is lobbying for.
Spring Meetings are underway this week for the SEC. Commissioner Greg Sankey has put forward the case for a 16-team playoff. Through all the chatter, Sankey made it clear that, despite three consecutive National Championships won by three different Big Ten teams, the SEC remains the best conference in all of College Football.
MORE: College Football’s NIL era may be headed for financial disaster
Greg Sankey highlights the SEC’s depth
Sankey’s exact comments were: “If you look at the entirety of our league, we are by far the most competitive, the strongest football league by far.”
Sankey further expanded on his opinion by saying, “But I think from a big picture, the breadth, the depth of this league, this league stands alone. In fact, we saw the metrics out of the college football playoff presentation where there’s no doubt we’re the strongest league.”
MORE: SEC makes massive change for future college football scheduling
There’s a difference between the best and the deepest conference
Sankey has a point: the SEC is the deepest when it comes to the talent pool and the week-to-week grind of its schedule, especially this upcoming year, as the new schedule format debuts, with every team facing nine conference opponents.
There are legitimately six teams that have a real shot at winning the SEC in 2026. Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Ole Miss, LSU, and Texas A&M all have the talent to make a conference title run. A seventh team can be mentioned if the Alabama QB situation works out the way Bama fans think it will, with either Keelon Russell or Austin Mack starting.
The Big Ten can’t say it has seven teams that can legitimately win the conference. That doesn’t matter though, cause theres a difference between the best conference and the deepest, and there just isn’t any better argument than the fact that the Big Ten has had three consecutive National Champions, and they’ve all been different schools. The argument would be different if Ohio State were on some sort of dynasty run, demolishing the rest of the Big Ten and SEC opponents on their way to two or three straight championships. The fact that it’s been three different schools doing this means the Big Ten has better top-end talent than the SEC over the last three years, and that matters more than overall depth.